치근피개술의 임상적 효과 비교
A Comparison of Clinical Effect for Root Coverage
한종수, 홍기석, 정진형, 임성빈,
소속 상세정보
한종수 ( Han Jong-Soo ) - 단국대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실
홍기석 ( Hong Ki-Seok ) - 단국대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실
정진형 ( Chung Chin-Hyung ) - 단국대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실
임성빈 ( Lim Sung-Bin ) - 단국대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실
KMID : 0363020080380030483
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare clinical effect of the Langer & Langer technique , the modified Langer & Langer technique and Bruno technique.
Material and Methods: 30 patients who have gingiva recession(Miller class I or class II) were carried root coverage. Langer & Langer technique(14 patients/32 tooth), modified Langer & Langer technique(5 patients/10 tooth) and Bruno technique(11 patients/18 tooth) was carried. At baseline and average 3 months after operation, it was estimated clinical index(Pocket depth, gingiva recession, clinical attachment level, keratinized gingiva, scar tissue, root coverage rate) by Williams style probe.
Result: Root coverage rate is indicated Langer & Langer technique(85%), Modified Langer & Langer technique(86%) and Bruno technique(90%).
Conclusion: All three of the procedures were effective in gingival recession and improved clinical parameters.
키워드
Gingiva recession;Root coverage;Langer and Langer technique;Bruno technique
원문 및 링크아웃 정보
등재저널 정보